One of my friends who has been reading this blog from the start with great
interest and enthusiasm made a comment to me recently that gave me pause
regarding my blog posts (a long pause as you can probably guess).
The comment was simply, "Very interesting! But what did the last few posts about ancient
Chinese culture have to do with Chinese science? Or the greater enterprise of comparative
science and philosophy between the three cultures you've targeted?"
With that in mind, I felt it necessary to write a tighter theoretical
framework for those who didn't want to lose the thread of the narrative. For those who are simply interested in the
tidbits I bring forth from philosophy, history of science, and the actual disciplines
of the natural sciences you might want to skip the next few posts. They will probably put you to sleep.
But for those seeking a scaffold or structure or at least a little insight
into what will appear on this blog, you might want to pay some attention. So my stated goals are:
1.) Understanding the history and development of the Natural Sciences in
the West. This would also imply figuring
out all the political, social, cultural, theological, and philosophical inputs
into what shaped our current understanding on how we investigate Nature.
To help folks along, I've decided to write a set of posts called
"Foundations" - which will hopefully offer a road map to the reader
for future posts.
As the great English writer John Donne wrote in his work Devotions upon
Emergent Occasions, "No man is an Island, entire of himself, every man is
a piece of the Continent." So
before launching into it, I would like to acknowledge the debt I owe to my
teachers and scholars whose works I have oftened read and pondered on these
matters.
If anything I write sounds halfway intelligible - praise them for I am
merely a transmitter not an originator.
No comments:
Post a Comment